Site map    |       Subscription    |     Russian

Archive

<< < March 2017 > >>
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

News

Big news brings only tiny returns for publishers

The sudden election victory and chaotic early days of Donald Trump’s presidency have been a boon for newspaper publishers, which have reported sharp rises in subscriptions.

The New York Times added a file 277,000 new digital subscribers within the fourth quarter, whereas the Wall Street Journal gained 110,000 in the identical interval.

The business image for publishers is much less rosy. Yes, circulation revenues are rising however print promoting, which went into freefall in 2016, has not mounted a comeback.

Publishers want to search out extra sources of income and, worryingly, the brand new era of so-called “distributed content” companies, which held such promise a yr in the past, are usually not slicing the mustard.

Services equivalent to Facebook Instant Articles, Apple News and Google Accelerated Mobile Pages have been presupposed to make it simpler for publishers to monetise their journalism. The companies give publishers the power to make use of the expertise firms’ large scale and attain on-line to draw new readers and — hopefully — promoting.

However, a latest report by Digital Content Next, which represents publishers and media teams together with Condé Nast, the Financial Times, NBCUniversal and the New York Times, discovered that distributed content material companies have been accountable for a median of 14 per cent of writer revenues within the first half of 2016 — or $7.7m per firm.

With print promoting revenues falling at greater than 20 per cent at most huge publishers in 2016, this tiny contribution is hardly sufficient to place minds comfy. It turns into even much less important when the contribution from video monetisation is included.

The DCN report, which included platforms equivalent to YouTube and Snapchat, says $6.5m of the typical $7.7m from distributed content material got here from video promoting. Given that DCN’s members embody heavyweight broadcasters equivalent to NBCUniversal, which have a considerable presence on YouTube, this implies text-based journalism generated a median of simply $1.2m for every writer over six months.

This ought to alarm the publishers eager to make use of the dimensions of social networks equivalent to Facebook to succeed in new readers. But do the publishers have any selection aside from to embrace new companies from the tech firms?

A research by the Pew Research Center final month revealed that 35 per cent of digital news shoppers within the US get their news from social media. Roughly the identical quantity go to news web sites, whereas 20 per cent use engines like google.

The essential beneficiaries are Facebook and Google. A latest eMarketer report stated the publishers have been prepared to place their content material on companies equivalent to Facebook Instant Articles or Google AMP as a result of they hoped readers could be so impressed by the standard of what they discovered that they “would look for more of the same on the publishers’ sites”. But as a substitute, “readers spent more time with those platforms, and therefore boosted revenue to those platforms.”

Publishers are in a troublesome spot. Pumping out news by Facebook and Google delivers extra readers and ensures that the work of their journalists is talked about and shared on-line. But it barely makes them any cash. Take the articles off these companies, although, and what subscription revenues they’ve could be protected, albeit on the expense of readership.

Their predicament underlines the issues going through the news business. As writer advert revenues have tanked, the flowing to Facebook and Google have soared: the 2 firms accounted for 75 per cent of digital advert gross sales within the US in 2016, in keeping with a report from Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

Given how a lot site visitors and consumer engagement publishers ship — for free — to the tech titans, it could be in Silicon Valley’s curiosity to offer extra thought to the way it may assist the news business.

Emily Bell, the founding director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia Journalism School, lately known as for a “radical new market intervention” and the creation of an endowment to fund and safeguard unbiased journalism — an endowment that the tech firms would fund to the tune of $1bn every.

Mark Zuckerberg and his friends have, to date, confirmed no signal that they’re about to dip into their pockets. Still, publishers on either side of the Atlantic will proceed to carry out hope that the expertise firms give you higher monetisation fashions for their content material. Without one, a news business with a quickly shrinking promoting base will itself inevitably shrink, too.

Source: Financial Times